I was only able to find the "1% in poll candidates" debate and of the debate that I watched, I thought that Bobby Jindal was the strongest candidate (this has nothing to do with the fact that I did a background check on him in my previous blog post.) I thought that he presented himself extremely well and had quite a strong case for each question that was thrown at him. Of the four candidates Jindal was the most diverse on topics he chose to address for each question. All the other candidates tended to stick to only one topic no matter what question they had. I feel that this debate was more of a political theater rather than an honest debate. Each of the candidates were only saying what the audience wanted to hear and for the most part only stuck to one topic. For example, Graham, for every question, would respond with wanting to deploy more troops to the Middle East and that every decision Obama has made in office is wrong and that he is going to "fix" every mistake Obama supposably made. The candidates intentions were not to spread their honest opinions during the debate but to impress the audience in order to raise their standings in the polls.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2015
Categories |